EK RUKA HUA FAISLA CASE STUDY

EK RUKA HUA FAISLA CASE STUDY

He again showsa mix of charismatic and a follower in his decision making style and was a victim of the status quobias like most other characters in this movie. Raina stands against such a decision and demands that the jury should give appropriate timeto the issue and have a healthy discussion on the entire case. He is calm, cool, and collected, and is probably one ofthe few jury members who fully understand his role as a jury. He portrays the role of the most indifferent character. But he is also a part of the vote and has to make up his own mind along with making sure the proceedings are done without disruptions. He is one of the characters who show an adult ego state while thedecision making process. Characteristics of 12 Jurors in the movie:

Other than that, he was acting like a follower and going with the flow of majority. Manjil Prasad Shrestha Roll No: Ek Ruka Hua Faisla is a movie about 19 year old boy who was a suspect for murder of his father. Another impressive aspect of the movie is its attention to detail, as each and every small and sometimes unimaginable nuance of the case is analyzed and debated upon, and yet the script and dialogues keep you engrossed all the time. He is one of the characters who show an adult ego state while thedecision making process. The case against the boy looks certain and strong, as there is a witness in the form of an old man who claims to have heard the incident and another woman who claims to have seen the actual act of murdering. Along with this, he approaches thetrial logically, calmly and competently by scrutinizing each and every fact discussed during thetrial, so that they are doubly sure that they havent left any loop-hole during their decisionmaking process.

He again showsa mix of charismatic and a follower in his decision making style and was a victim of the status quobias like most other characters in this movie. Sometimes, Conflicts rukw involve in the communication process.

Another impressive aspect of the movie is its attention to detail, as each and every small and sometimes unimaginable nuance of the case is analyzed and debated upon, and yet the script and dialogues keep engage and attention till the very end.

  BACHELOR THESIS HTW CHUR

ek ruka hua faisla case study

The one guy who is not fully convinced manages to change the vote of one other jury member who is the oldest in the room. Power of Communication effect: Ruma movie is probably the best medium for us to know about subject matters of organizational behavior topics like perception, attitude, behavior, leadership, team formation, norming and storming of team work, group dynamics, motivation, conflict management, personality easily in an entertaining way within short period of taisla.

In the situation of conflict, People do not want to listen to others. The case against the boy looks certain and strong, as there is a witness in the form of an old man who claims to have heard the incident and another woman who claims to have seen the hka act of murdering.

Case study on Power of Communication by movie – Ek ruka hua faisla – [PDF Document]

From here begins a vociferous and sometimes downright argumentative discussion, with most of the jury members ending up fighting with xtudy or the other in trying to make a point or accept another.

Ek Ruka Hua Faisla is a movie about 19 year old boy who was a suspect for murder of his father. But there is only one jury cade who is not completely convinced about the case and he starts the discussions, in which all the members have to participate to reach a common conclusion.

He showed a lot of arrogance in his style was trying to influence othersin the favor of punishing the guilty without going over the detailed facts. He displaysa typical child ego state who is excited but not serious about the task assigned. acse

Hebecomes very defensive and does not react well to others prejudice. Since he comes from a similarbackground, he is in a better position to understand the accused situations and empathize with him. Moreover there is the weapon i. We can classify some other learning into following categories: He was one of themembers who were ready with the decision almost immediately when the discussion started, butlater on when logic and facts were presented, he changed sides.

Characteristics of 12 Jurors in the movie: He was behavingas if he is just passing his time and is least interested in the decision making process. There are twelve male members of a jury who have gathered together in an enclosed room to deliberate on charges of murder against a young boy accused of killing his own father.

  ESSAY ON WHITE LIES BY NATASHA TRETHEWEY

Ek ruka hua faisla case study

casee What differentiates all these men from the protagonist Jury No. He show no regard to protocols orjustice and does not actively support the decision making process. Thepower of asking various questions and coming to down to common view made them think aboutvarious analytics.

Help Center Find new research papers in: Juror 9 Anu Kapoor: By Jonathan Clough and Jacqueline Horan.

ek ruka hua faisla case study

This helps to confirm your knowledge aboutthe subject plot and also to know more things which are missing or we dont know. He showed signs of thinker andcontroller in his decision making style. He acts as a co-ordinator throught the film.

Ek ruka hua faisla case study

Equal and fair chance to voice their opinions A welcoming and supporting environment Experience trust, acceptance and understanding within the team New learnings i. He is calm, cool, and collected, and is probably one ofthe few jury members who fully understand his role as a jury.

In this movie, we observe the entire decision making process and way the people communicatewith each other, where each individual had different perception and different behavior inparticular situation, their personal opinion leads them to one wrong decision first but later onwith just one leading, convincing, neutral and practical individual, they were able to think on theother side of the case and finally they reached to right conclusion.

Secondly whenever some decisions are taken as faila team then the focus should be on taking the viewpoints of everybody and collectively coming to a decision rather than focusing on expressing only individual viewpoints and influencing others as well. Skip to main content.